1st Draft Film Treatment - (Scrapped)
Working
Title – ‘Crossroads’,
‘Intersection’, ‘Injection’.
Logline – “You can’t split a prize”,
when four groups go after the same goal, their paths inevitably cross.
Characters:
Group 1 – Timmy, Ash, Broker
and Big Mike. – Street thugs
Group 2 – John, Paul,
James and Ringo - drug dealers
Group 3 – Clive
‘screws loose’ Jones, Teatime, Machiavelli and Sarge – Professional
Group 4 – Herald,
Windsor, Jefferson and Orson– NRS A
Mysterious overarching
figure – Mr B.I.G
Hired Assassin –
Dominique
Courier – Roger Moor,
“the Saint”
Who, What,
When, Why and Where:
4 Groups of criminals who range in capability are
individually contacted by a superior power, Mr B.I.G. They are told to rob an
unknown item from a location. It is set in the late 90’s/early 2000’s. Mr B.I.G is actually a group of
3 crime bosses, who wish to remove all opposition with one fell swoop,
so they hope the groups will eliminate themselves but also hire a female
assassin to clean up. No actual known physical location, urban run down setting
to suburban town houses.
Structure
ACT 1:
Starts off with the 4 groups heading towards the location
they are going to rob, first 2 groups there collide. This is the opening
titles. Time goes back to a week earlier. The courier goes to each of the groups
with their assignment, steal a package from a secure transit going to manor
house. Each group then goes to recon out the route and the house, hints at
conflict as all groups go at once, and suspicion grows as they encounter each
other. Then each group plans their heist, fake reality scenes of how each of
their heists take place. Assassin
reports back to Mr B.I.G with the news that they are getting on with it.
ACT 2:
Now we are up to speed with the opening titles, this time
shows different perspectives. The 2 groups collide in a car crash (drug dealers
and the street thugs), they are injured and knocked out (Big Mike dies).
Transit van diverts its route, the other groups chase after it in vehicles,
realising they have been set up but not realising that they are working for the
same person. Both groups inadvertently work together to disable the secure
transit. The security team escape whilst both groups argue. At this point the
other 2 crashed groups wake up, fighting ensues and only Ash and Ringo survive.
The security team make it to the mansion with the two groups close behind Ash
and Ringo also make their way to the manor house independently.
ACT 3:
Climatic scene at the manor house, 2 groups arrive at
different times and set up for attack. They both go in different ways and
encounter security, one person dies from each group. Both groups converge on
the package, fighting ensues, only Sarge and Orson live, with Orson
incapacitated. Sarge makes his way out, encounters Ash and then Ringo storms in,
Orson then encounters them, 4-way stand-off. The assassin now begins to attack
them, they survive and get information that they were all set up, the assassin
is killed. The new group of all 4 go for Mr B.I.G, kick down the door of his
office, movie ends.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why I decided to not do this treatment
This was my original treatment idea, I decided to scrap it for a number of reasons. First of all it was ambitious but impractical. The ideas would have worked out well in my imagination and with a big budget film production company. The stunts such as a car crash would be unlikely to be possible. Even though I had researched the possibility of camera tricks to make a car crash work it would not have the desired effect that I want and would look potentially low rent, and I am aiming to make the most professional product I can.
The props chosen are also unlikely to get hold of at this stage, drugs, money and guns are hard to acquire for film companies so it is more or less impossible for me to get any to create the desired effect. The amount of characters I included would be difficult to manage at this level, I would need 8 good actors, which is unlikely. Even after exploring the possibility of removing characters or making some not talk, it removed my vision of the product. Also the overall plot of the film and my opening after consideration seems far fetched, and not brilliant.
The amount of work required is also very high, a vast number of innovative shots and organisation that just heightens the already impossibility of this film opening. And the overall idea is very unoriginal, it is highly influenced and based upon British Gangster films, mainly Guy Ritchie's. My new film opening is much more original.
But on the other hand this treatment has some use, I can apply the failures of this one to my new one, and avoid the same difficulties. Also the idea of action/thriller does carry across so I could potentially use ideas from this and implement them. This treatment also allows me to become more down to earth and realistic with my new opening, as much as I would like to create ambitious ideas, it is on a practical level improbable and the eventual product would not have the desired affect as it would not look as I envisage. With my new treatment the ideas are more effective, symbolism it uses which is easy to film but carries strong messages, fewer characters are used and all shots are do-able.
Overall this treatment is not a total failure, it serves as an example for me to not follow, but does still inspire me with ideas. As Coco Channel said “Success is most often achieved by those who don’t know that failure is inevitable.”